Imagine needing crucial medicines at the last minute—whether it's for a sudden fever or an ongoing prescription refill. Waiting hours isn't an option. That's where Apollo 24|7 Tez steps in. Our service ensures you get your medicines delivered to your doorstep within just 20-30 minutes, powered by the trusted Apollo network. It's fast, reliable, and always there when you need it most.
Health emergencies can't wait, and with Apollo 24|7 Tez, neither should you.
The fundamental need that Apollo 24|7 Tez addresses is quick access to essential medicines during urgent situations. The service is designed to cater to scenarios where immediate medical supplies are required, whether for sudden illness, ongoing treatments, or emergency refills. By delivering medicines within 20-30 minutes, Apollo 24|7 Tez removes the anxiety of waiting and ensures that users have timely access to the healthcare products they need, especially when time is of the essence.
PMF? Early scaling? Mature scaling?
The new product Tez has been launched recently and has saw its first 1000 users a few weeks ago. Also, after the pilot stage, key metrics like cancellation rate and TAT adherence are at acceptable levels as per success definitions (5% and 90% respectively).Hence the product has successfully obtained PMF and now is in early scaling phase.
Speaking to 35 people who purchased a medicine in the last 30 days, ages 21-45, a few broad theme emerged:
What are the primary reasons users prefer retail (offline stores) shopping for medicines?
What are the primary reasons users prefer online shopping for medicines?
How are the users’ needs (urgent need of medicine) met right now?
Apollo 24|7 Tez stands out by addressing the need for both speed and reliability in medicine delivery, a gap that existing solutions may not fully address.
One theme that stood out was that: For emergency needs users often end up going themselves or taking help of someone to purchase from the nearest pharmacy. In any case, due to lack of delivery options, users’ urgent needs are catered by retail pharmacies.
Customer profiles include those of urban households, the elderly, chronic patients, and busy professionals who prioritize convenience and quality in healthcare. After polling with users I spoke to, I have chosen to consider the following customer profiles:
Criteria | ICP 1: Caretaker | ICP 2: No Prescription, Urgent Medicine Need | ICP 3: Urgent OTC Products | ICP 4: Non-Prescription, Skin Care Products |
Age Range | 25-40 years | 25-40 years | 30-50 years | 18-35 years |
Demographics | Adults, married, urban areas, working professionals who are caretakers of retirees | Young professionals, urban areas, tech-savvy, single/married | Middle-aged adults, married, urban/semi-urban areas, parents | Young adults, urban areas, students, or professionals |
Need | Urgent refill of prescription medications for their parents | Urgent need for medicines (e.g., stomach or viral infection) without a prescription | Fast access to over-the-counter products (e.g., pain relief, fever reducers) | Urgent need for skincare products typically unavailable on q-commerce apps |
Pain Point | Needs medication quickly but can't visit a pharmacy | Needs medication but doesn't have a prescription readily available | Needs quick relief but doesn’t have time to visit a pharmacy | Skincare products are not easily available through other fast-delivery services |
Solution | Apollo 24/7 Tez delivers prescription refills within 20-30 minutes | Apollo 24/7 Tez connects users to a doctor online within 5 minutes and delivers medication quickly | Apollo 24/7 Tez delivers necessary OTC products quickly and reliably | Apollo 24/7 Tez offers fast delivery of skincare products, ensuring timely access |
Behavior | Regular user of online medical services for convenience | Relies on online services to meet healthcare needs quickly | Prefers fast and reliable service for non-prescription products | Seeks out skincare products urgently due to routine or emergency |
Perceived Value of Brand | Trusts Apollo for reliable, fast, and accurate delivery of essential medications | Values the convenience of quick doctor consultations and fast delivery | Appreciates the speed and availability of essential OTC products | Sees Apollo as a trustworthy source for high-quality skincare products with quick access |
Marketing Pitch | "Get your essential prescriptions refilled and delivered in under 30 minutes with Apollo 24/7 Tez." | "Need medicine but no prescription? Connect with a doctor and get your order delivered in 30 minutes." | "Fast relief is just a click away. Get your OTC products delivered within 30 minutes with Apollo 24/7 Tez." | "Get your essential skincare products delivered fast with Apollo 24/7 Tez—when beauty can't wait." |
Goals | Access medication quickly without interrupting daily routine | Obtain necessary treatment without waiting for a doctor’s visit | Relieve symptoms quickly and effectively without pharmacy trips | Access skincare products quickly for emergencies or routine needs |
Frequency of Use Case | 1-2 times a month | 1-2 times a month | 1-2 times a month | Once a month or during emergencies |
Average Spend on Product | ₹1,500 - ₹2,000 per month | ₹1,000 - ₹1,500 per month | ₹500 - ₹1,000 per month | ₹1,000 per month |
Value Accessibility to Product | High—available on-demand in their location | High—available quickly and with consultation | Moderate—available in most areas but sometimes limited by stock | High—available in their location with quick delivery |
Value Experience of Product | High—seamless, quick, and reliable | High—convenient and resolves immediate needs | Positive—quick access to relief with minimal friction | Positive—fast delivery of high-quality products when needed |
Lets evaluate the 4 ICP across key criteria
Criteria | ICP 1: Urgent Prescription Refill | ICP 2: No Prescription, Urgent Medicine Need | ICP 3: Urgent OTC Products | ICP 4: Non-Prescription, Skin Care Products |
Adoption Curve | Medium | High | Medium | Medium |
Appetite to Pay | High | Moderate | Moderate | Low to Moderate |
Frequency of Use Case | 1-2 times a month | 1-2 times a month | 1-2 times a month | Once a month or during emergencies |
Distribution Potential | High | High | Medium | Medium |
TAM (in ₹ billion annually) | $2.225B | $6.75B | $4.5B | $2.225B |
Based on the above, ICP 2 and ICP 3 should be prioritized.
NOTE:
Assumptions for Calculations
TAM = Total no. of potential customers x Average Revenue Per Customer (ARPU)
SAM = TAM x Target Market Segment (percentage of the total market)
SOM = SAM x Market Penetration/Share
(begin by doing a basic competitor analysis)
Factors | 1MG | Pharmeasy | Flipkart Health+ |
What is the core problem being solved by them? | User’s pharma and diagnostics needs | Integrated pharma supply chain solutions including e-pharmacy | Users’ pharma needs at a discounted price point |
What are the products/features/services being offered? | 3 hours delivery | Same day delivery | Next day delivery |
Who are the users? | Primarily chronic user in tier 1 and 2 cities | Primarily chronic user in tier 1 and 2 cities | Primarily chronic user in tier 1 and 2 cities |
GTM Strategy | Educational content, transparency, and quality service for trust-building. | Discounts, subscription services, and health camps for customer acquisition. | Discounts, subscription services, and health camps for customer acquisition. |
What channels do they use? | Organic primarily, also paid | Paid | Paid |
What pricing model do they operate on? | Standard pricing, discounts for loyalty program members | Standard pricing, discounts for loyalty program members | Deep discounting |
How have they raised funding? | VC, PE | Institutional investors | Institutional investors |
Brand Positioning | Trusted for quality care and comprehensive drug information. | Affordable and accessible with a focus on comprehensive care. | Affordable and accessible. |
UX Evaluation | Highly informative and user-friendly, supporting informed healthcare decisions. | User-friendly with a focus on seamless healthcare access. | Familiar e-commerce experience |
What can you learn from them? | Content and SEO strategy for user acquisition | Partner programs and health camps for user acquisition | Effective use of discounts and customer retention strategies. |
Key Market Trends/ Tailwinds:
Headwinds:
Market shares
As per the calculation in the previous section, we have the following TAM, SAM and SOM for ICP 2 and ICP 3
Users needing medicines urgently are likely to go to google and search. Looking at key search terms, Apollo 24|7 has a lot of room to improve.
Search terms:
Observation: Despite Apollo’s Tez being the only service that’s closest to fulfilling user’s needs, Apollo 24|7 does not appear on the first fold of results
Search term: How long does Apollo Pharmacy take to deliver?
Observation: Answer does not talk about Tez at all
Currently blogs are a channel of content loop that is being generated. For these blogs:
Observation: The engagement on these blogs is very little
Currently, there is no effort being put into paid channels for promoting Tez, as seen below from Meta and google ads library. This because there is an org-wide effort in action to reduce expenses.
Meta:
Google:
Currently there are no product integrations in place aimed at customer acquisition for Tez.
We know that customers from ICP2 and ICP3 use quick commerce products like Zepto, Blinkit, Bigbasket and instamart.
Integrating with the above products could be considered.
Product | Synergies | Roadblocks |
Instamart |
| NA |
Blinkit | NA | |
Bigbasket Now |
| |
Zepto |
| NA |
Hence integrating with Zepto makes most sense.
Pharmacy order impact guesstimate
Potential Apollo Orders= 21,000,000×0.2×0.10
Potential Apollo Orders= 420,000 orders per month
We also know that customers from ICP2 and ICP3 use health tracking products like fitbit
Pharmacy order impact guesstimate
Potential Apollo Orders=10,000,000 users×0.03×0.10
=30,000 orders per month
Apollo 24|7 currently does not have a live referral program.
Here is a rough plan for the referral program:
Applying the prioritization framework here for our proposed channel activities:
Channel Name | Cost | Flexibility | Effort | Speed | Scale |
Organic | Med | Low | Med | Med | Med |
Paid Ads | High | High | Med | Med | High |
Referral Program | Med | Med | Med | Low | High |
Product Integration | Low | Low | Med | Med | High |
Content Loops | Low | Med | High | Med | Low |
We can see that the best channels to experiment with and work on are Organic, Referral and Product integrations
Note: There is an org-wide effort in action to reduce expenses. Hence Paid ads would not be picked.
Analyzing the customer needs, our product, the market, our current scale and strategies, we can conclude that the best channels to experiment with and work on are Organic, Referral and Product integrations.
Brand focused courses
Great brands aren't built on clicks. They're built on trust. Craft narratives that resonate, campaigns that stand out, and brands that last.
All courses
Master every lever of growth — from acquisition to retention, data to events. Pick a course, go deep, and apply it to your business right away.
Explore foundations by GrowthX
Built by Leaders From Amazon, CRED, Zepto, Hindustan Unilever, Flipkart, paytm & more
Crack a new job or a promotion with the Career Centre
Designed for mid-senior & leadership roles across growth, product, marketing, strategy & business
Learning Resources
Browse 500+ case studies, articles & resources the learning resources that you won't find on the internet.
Patience—you’re about to be impressed.